
Imaging systems, infusion pumps, monitors, implants with remote programming, and health software in hospital networks and clouds.
Infusion pumps, imaging systems, monitors and implants are connected to hospital networks, apps and clouds. Health software runs in data centres and on phones. A vulnerability can affect diagnosis, therapy and patient data.
Regulators have responded. The EU MDR treats security as part of safety and performance, and the FDA expects a complete cybersecurity file before it clears a connected device. Manufacturers need evidence across the whole product life.
The attack paths we see most often in medical technology, from the implant to the hospital network.
Wireless
Bluetooth, radio and Wi-Fi links to implants, pumps and wearables can accept unauthorised commands if they lack authentication.
Network
Devices share networks with office IT. Ransomware that hits the hospital can reach imaging and monitoring systems.
Legacy
Imaging and lab systems often run on operating systems that are no longer supported, because every change needs new evidence.
Cloud
Remote monitoring and therapy apps move patient data, and sometimes settings, through cloud services.
Service
Manufacturers maintain installed devices remotely. Shared credentials and always-on connections are frequent weaknesses.
Updates
Updates must be fast enough for security and controlled enough for safety. Unsigned updates are a direct risk.
Supply chain
Devices use operating systems and libraries from many suppliers. Without an SBOM, nobody knows where a new vulnerability applies.
Data
Health data is valuable to criminals. Breaches lead to penalties, lawsuits and lost trust.
Three documented cases from healthcare. They show how cyberattacks reach patients, from the hospital network to the implant.
May 2017, ransomware
The WannaCry ransomware spread worldwide on 12 May 2017 through a Windows vulnerability for which a patch was already available. In England, around a third of NHS hospital trusts were disrupted, and some had to divert ambulances.
Impact
Around 19,000 appointments and operations were cancelled. The Department of Health later estimated the cost at £92 million.
Sources: UK National Audit Office, October 2017; Department of Health and Social Care, 2018
August 2017, implant vulnerabilities
Researchers showed that radio-connected pacemakers from St. Jude Medical, now Abbott, could be accessed without authorisation using commercially available equipment.
Impact
The FDA approved a firmware update as a recall for about 465,000 devices in the US, and patients had to visit their clinic to receive it. No patient harm was reported, but the case changed how regulators look at device security.
Sources: FDA safety communication, August 2017; Abbott; RAPS
February 2024, ransomware
Attackers used a stolen login without multi-factor authentication to enter the systems of Change Healthcare, a large processor of medical claims, and deployed ransomware on 21 February 2024.
Impact
Pharmacies and practices could not process claims for weeks. Data of about 190 million people was affected, a ransom of USD 22 million was paid, and the parent company projected costs of about USD 2.9 billion.
Sources: UnitedHealth Group; Fierce Healthcare; Healthcare Finance News
Six building blocks that satisfy notified bodies and the FDA and keep devices secure after release.
1
Security risks are assessed in their own process and linked to safety, so every threat is traced to its possible harm.
2
A process according to IEC 81001-5-1, integrated with software development to IEC 62304.
3
A complete software bill of materials and continuous monitoring of every component in it.
4
Authentication, encryption and signed updates for every interface of the device.
5
A public channel for researchers and a process to assess, fix and communicate findings.
6
The cybersecurity file that notified bodies and the FDA expect, kept current after release.
From the first gap analysis to the cybersecurity file for your submission and the process after release.
Clarity on the MDR, the FDA and further rules for your devices.
What we do
You receive
Gap list, submission roadmap
Security built into your device and its ecosystem.
What we do
You receive
Threat model, requirements, risk file
Evidence that the controls work, before and after release.
What we do
You receive
Test report, SBOM, postmarket process
An organisation that supports secure products.
What we do
You receive
ISMS documentation, audit plan
Step 1
We agree on the devices, markets and submissions in scope.
Step 2
Workshops and a review of your design and risk files show where you stand.
Step 3
We create the work products with your engineers, or generate them with AITIGRITY.
Step 4
Tests, reviews and submission support close the gaps that matter.
Require protection against unauthorised access as part of safety and performance (Annex I). MDCG 2019-16 explains what notified bodies expect.
Since March 2023, submissions for cyber devices in the US must include a plan for postmarket vulnerabilities, an SBOM and evidence of secure design.
The security lifecycle for health software and medical device software, complementing IEC 62304.
Risk management for medical devices. Security risks with a possible safety impact are part of it.
Devices placed on the market under the MDR or IVDR are excluded from the CRA, but apps, accessories and software outside these rules can fall under it. NIS2 covers many healthcare providers and parts of the industry.
The consulting services and AITIGRITY modules medical technology companies use most often.
A short scoping call shows what your next submission needs and which steps come first.
Talk to an expertDevices placed on the market under the MDR or IVDR are excluded from the CRA. Companion apps, accessories and non-medical software can fall under it. We check this per product.
A plan for postmarket vulnerabilities, a software bill of materials, a threat model and evidence of security testing, as described in its premarket guidance and section 524B.
Security risks are assessed in their own process and linked to ISO 14971 wherever they can cause harm. AAMI TIR57 and IEC 81001-5-1 describe how.
Yes. We prepare the cybersecurity parts of your technical documentation and help you answer reviewer questions.
Tell us about your product and the rule you are facing. You talk to an engineer from the first call.